Tristan wrote: > This is only partly true. First, the OPL chip used on ADLIBs is not > called OPL1. Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on OPL1 is contained inside the OPL2 used by AdLib cards. The OPL1 part of OPL2 chips is register-compatible with OPL1 chips and delivers exactly the same output. And you're right, OPL1 is not the same as OPLL + something. It is indeed a different beast. :) []s, Parn **** MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/) ****
Re: OPLL emulation (was: AW: "philosophical" view of emulation vs real thing)
Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba Thu, 15 Jul 1999 04:29:51 -0700
- AW: "philosophical" view of emulati... Coen van der Geest
- AW: "philosophical" view of em... Coen van der Geest
- Re: AW: "philosophical" vi... Alex Wulms
- Re: OPLL emulation (was: AW: &qu... Tristan
- Re: OPLL emulation (was: AW:... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- Re: OPLL emulation (was... Alex Wulms
- Re: OPLL emulation ... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- Re: OPLL emulat... Alex Wulms
- Re: OPLL emulat... Tristan
- Re: OPLL emulat... Laurens Holst
- Re: OPLL emulation ... Tristan
- Re: OPLL emulat... Alex Wulms
- Re: OPLL emulation (was... AkA DanSHakU
- Re: OPLL emulation ... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- Re: OPLL emulat... AkA DanSHakU