On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:38:09 +0200, Laurens Holst wrote:
>Err... isn't two NOPs easier??? Or an LD A,value:OUT (#99),A (the LD A,value
>is 7 T-states)...
>It is only nessacary to wait 7 Z80 T-states (So in reality 8 T-states on
>MSX). LD A,value takes 7 T-states. If executing an IN right after an OUT you
>can best put an LD A,(DE) inbetween. It only takes 7(8) T-states (2xNOP
>takes 8(10)), and it is only one byte (2xNOP is two bytes).
No. In some situations you need to wait a long time (imagine the wait of
2 NOPs on a 7Mhz cpu or on TR). We ALWAYS want speed but 100%
compatible.
>> they ignore the BIOS...
>I NEVER use the BIOS. It's just so da@# f&*$king SLOW!!!
FAST almost always means incompatible.
[]'s Daniel Caetano ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
...IBM: Inept Bulling Menace
OS/2 Sites: http://www.os2brasil.com.br/novidades/
http://www.os2brasil.com.br/novidades/drivers.shtml
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/8752/os2hp/index.html
MSX Sites: http://www.fudeba.cjb.net/ e http://www.msxnews.cjb.net/
MSX Phoenix: http://www.msxphoenix.cjb.net/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
