Hi, On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > - the build process says that it would prefer dynamic libraries, but > > will go ahead and try static ones (for libsvn_*), > > Do you know why dynamic libraries aren't being created? I like to think > I have a pretty decent understanding of how libtool works, but then I > actually have no idea what it does in a Windows context. I have no idea (yet). But as Christian pointed out, it could be a peculiarity in the Win32 handling of libtool/autoconf. > > - when I run "git svn", it works, > > > > - when I run "git svn clone <url>", it crashes, and the crashdump shows > > only _one_ hexadecimal address in the stackdump. No function name, no > > function name_s_. > > Ouch. Out of curiosity, what kind of urls have you tried? Depending on > if it's http:// or svn://, different libraries will be used (neon for > http://, I believe). http:// > > > No, I just cloned on a Linux machine and had a look around. But I've got > > > a windows partition on my laptop, so I'll try it from there. > > > > Wow, another Linux developer providing development assistance ;-) > > Even though I've purged Windows from nearly all my computers, I still > have a soft spot in my heart that wants git to work right there. My > knowledge of C is pretty weak, but I'd like to think I can at least hack > up some build fixes. ;-) I know your feeling. I live without Windows since 1994. It has not always been easy, but always pleasing. Especially the lack of a need to install an antivirus (although I _got_ a virus _once_ on Linux; a server connected to the internet 24/7, with a user "ron" with password "ron"... go figure). > > > I'm not sure what your last P.S. was about. Possibly the time on my > > > mail? I'm not subscribed, so I just threw in a reply from Google > > > Groups. And I'm not from central Europe. > > > > California? (Just a guess from the timezone.) > > Seattle, WA. Ah, closer to Linus than I am. Ah! ;-) Ciao, Dscho
