On Jun 10, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> I had a chance to think about this some more, and I'm wondering if this falls > into some new category of "member". Personally, I would really welcome > getting the MTT results from another site as it would expand coverage of > various environments, something we are beginning to lack. So even if Jaison > et al aren't going to contribute code, contributing test result data is a > valuable contribution in itself. > > I think this fits to your question about testing nightly OMPI tarballs. If > Jaison can run tests with our tarballs and tell us the results, and that > meets his needs to characterize/validate their cluster, then it seems like > both sides win. FWIW, this is already an existing definition of "member" (run tests only). That's what I was thinking when I asked whether they planned to test nightly tarballs (assumedly vs. just validating their cluster with release tarballs). -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
