Ok for the T=1 but with a GemXpresso 211PK (T=0), on my two reader i
have no the same result :
I send a cold reset to the card and I try to select the CM.
with GemPC410 I obtain :
> /atr
--Waiting for card...
ATR=3F 6D 00 00 80 31 80 65 B0 05 01 02 5E 83 00 90 ?m...1.e....^...
00 .
T=0, II=0/PI1=0, N=0, Hist=80318065B00501025E83009000
> /send 00A4040007A000000018434D00
=> 00 A4 04 00 07 A0 00 00 00 18 43 4D 00 ..........CM.
(263 msec)
<= 6F 18 84 07 A0 00 00 00 18 43 4D A5 0D 9F 6E 06 o........CM...n.
32 31 03 00 33 30 9F 65 01 FF 90 00 21..30.e....
Status: No Error
with GPR400 I obtain :
> /atr
--Waiting for card...
ATR=3F 6D 00 00 80 31 80 65 B0 05 01 02 5E 83 00 90 ?m...1.e....^...
00 .
T=0, II=0/PI1=0, N=0, Hist=80318065B00501025E83009000
> /send 00A4040007A000000018434D00
=> 00 A4 04 00 07 A0 00 00 00 18 43 4D 00 ..........CM.
(137 msec)
<= 61 1A a.
Status: 0x611A
With the GemPC410 perform the GET_RESPONSE (00C000001A) and not the GPR400.
I have the idea to look in the subdirectory common of the GemPC410
driver to find the solution. I have no many time to spend on this
problem. :-/
But if you want, i can try to help you.
Regards,
Damien Sauveron
Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 10:09, Damien Sauveron wrote:
>
>>There is on error on the install i have post :
>>replace ln -s 2 ../gpr400 by ln -s ../gpr400 2
>>
>>I have not a segmentation fault and my gpr400 works fine with the little
>>testpcsc program include in the pcsc-lite-1.1.1
>>
>>But i have some problems to use it with other tools.
>>An example of problems with 2 differents tools using PCSC:
>>
>>--Waiting for card...
>>ATR=3B E6 00 FF 81 31 FE 45 4A 43 4F 50 30 33 07 ;....1.EJCOP03.
>>T=1, II=0/PI1=0, N=255, IFSC=254, BWI=4/CWI=5, Hist="JCOP03"
>> => 00 A4 04 00 07 A0 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 .............
>> (33 msec)
>> <= 00 82 ..
>>Status: 0x0082
>>
>>With an other reader (gcr410) i have not this problem.
>>I have not the time to find a solution. Have you some idea?
>>
>
> Please point out what errors you see in the above. I don't want to
> guess what your problem is.
>
> I'm guessing that's a T=1 card, T=1 is not implemented in the IFD.
>
> -joe
>
_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
