Hi, On Wednesday 28 March 2007 11:58, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > On 28/03/07, Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Isn't it broken to have install the PCSC include files in the PCSC subdir > > and then to have them #include other PCSC include files but omit the PCSC > > part of the path? > > It is to be compatible with Windows with > #include <winscard.h> > > Your application should not include other PCSC files. > (or reader.h if you need it) [...] No, but winscard.h does. It's the same problem I ran into once. I think the original author is right that a simple "#include <winscard.h>" should suffice to get all needed stuff included.
However, winscard.h includes "<pcsclite.h>" instead of "<PCSC/pcsclite.h>". That makes it necessary to include the autoconf-magic (even if it only is necessary to add the appropriate pkg-config stuff into my own configure.ac). How does changing that particular directive in winscard.h make it incompatible with Windows, anyway? Or did misunderstand your statement? [...] > You should use pkg-config to know where to find the PCSC header files. [...] But that wouldn't be necessary if only winscard.h included <PCSC/pcsclite.h> instead of <pcsclite.h>. [...] > > I'd recommend changing this for 1.4.1. > > Proposition rejected. [...] That sounds final... However, making this change would at least save one step for the application (without putting Windows-compatiblity in jeopardy as far as I can see). Regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list Muscle@lists.musclecard.com http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
