[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-85?page=comments#action_12431723 ]
Dan Jemiolo commented on MUSE-85:
---------------------------------
On the hardcoding issue - I'll defer to Andrew, since I don't know how he
intends to allow people to name the capabilities. Perhaps it's "out of scope",
since the capabilities are broken up by namespace but the XSD/WSDL doesn't
really say what the "name" of the capability is.
On the WSDL - it looks like the tools is mistakenly generating the WSRP "get"
operations because your WSDL messages refer to tns:GetResourceProperty, etc.,
where "tns" is mapped to your Cisco namespace instead of the WSRP namespace. So
when the tool checks to see if you have any "standard" operations (like WSRP
GetResourceProperty), it finds none and instead generates code for your custom
{http://www.cisco.com/....}GetResourceProperty. It should be adding our WSRP
GetCapability to your descriptor instead, with no custom capabilities generated.
> WSDM Test File
> --------------
>
> Key: MUSE-85
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-85
> Project: Muse
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Other
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Steve Jerman
> Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo
> Attachments: MyCapabilityImpl.java, TestFile.zip, WSDM-POC-Model.gif
>
>
> OK, attached isa diagram which shows the model I am trying to create WSDM
> interfaces for. Also attached is a Zip file with a set of WSDLs. Basically I
> started with some generated XSD/WSDL and then decided that I should hand code
> a proto that validated correct and did the right stuff and use that as
> pattern. The system.wsdl file was the result. I *think* it should create a
> simple WSDM resource implementation with getResourcePropertyDocument and
> getResourceProperty operations. It sort of looks like thats the case.
> A few questions.
> What would some code look like that could handle multiple instances of
> System. Do I need to do anything different?
> Surely the Java interfaces generated are for the ManagedResource? They don't
> seem to be Capapability implementations.
> Looks like the name of the Java files is hard coded. Is there a better way to
> handle this?
> I would like to get this sample up and runing first and then expand out to
> the rest of my model (and all the configuration I have in mind).
> Steve
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
