[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-85?page=comments#action_12437627 ] Dan Jemiolo commented on MUSE-85: ---------------------------------
1. I was referring to whatever was filled in for the skeleton server-side code - what does it run against? If it's using in-memory state and not currently connected to some kind of easily-accessible product, then it would be similar to the wsrf or wsn-producer samples, no? 2. You can make a relationships impl that doesn't use ws-resources for the relationship representation, but it seems to me that you still need to store all of the same data and provide a means of lookup so you can manage the collection. I'm not really sure how much you are going to save by removing the ws-resource-ness of them. This should probably be clear before creating an alternate impl. > Possible sample project - System/Device > --------------------------------------- > > Key: MUSE-85 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-85 > Project: Muse > Issue Type: Test > Components: Other > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Steve Jerman > Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo > Fix For: 2.1.0 > > Attachments: MyCapabilityImpl.java, TestFile.zip, WSDM-POC-Model.gif, > WSDM-POC-Model.gif, xml.zip > > > OK, attached isa diagram which shows the model I am trying to create WSDM > interfaces for. Also attached is a Zip file with a set of WSDLs. Basically I > started with some generated XSD/WSDL and then decided that I should hand code > a proto that validated correct and did the right stuff and use that as > pattern. The system.wsdl file was the result. I *think* it should create a > simple WSDM resource implementation with getResourcePropertyDocument and > getResourceProperty operations. It sort of looks like thats the case. > A few questions. > What would some code look like that could handle multiple instances of > System. Do I need to do anything different? > Surely the Java interfaces generated are for the ManagedResource? They don't > seem to be Capapability implementations. > Looks like the name of the Java files is hard coded. Is there a better way to > handle this? > I would like to get this sample up and runing first and then expand out to > the rest of my model (and all the configuration I have in mind). > Steve -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
