Hey Andrew/All,

Can you share what the thoughts were on the degree of testing that would be
taking place?

As I understand things today, a comprehensive matrix will probably include
combinations of the following:

OSes                    JREs/J2MEs                      Muse container
====                    ==========                      ==============

Windows XP              Sun JRE 1.4.2_15                        Axis2 1.1 (on 
Tomcat 5.5.23)

RedHat Linux            Sun Java 5.0 Update 12          Axis2 1.1 (on Tomcat 
6.0.13) (?)

Any other OSes (?)      Sun Java 6.0 Update 2           miniSOAP (on Tomcat 
5.5.23)

                        IBM 1.4.2 SR 9                  miniSOAP (on Tomcat 
6.0.13) (?)

                        IBM Java 5.0 SR 5                       OSGi (version 
X.Y.Z) with J2SE

                        IBM Java 6.0                    OSGi (version X.Y.Z) 
with J2ME

                        J2ME (version X.Y.Z)

How much of this was envisioned taking place on the Apache-provided
machines?

If having enough machines to cover all the environment combinations presents
to be a restriction, which ones would be consider the priorities?

Regards,
    Kam K. Yee
    IBM Corporation



Andrew Eberbach wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I just heard back from the guys at apache and this might be something
>> they 
>> can accomodate. I'm still waiting to hear back with details. I'll keep
>> you 
>> posted. In the meanwhile I'm putting together the framework so that we
>> can 
>> start writing tests for it.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew
>> 
>> Andrew Eberbach
>> Autonomic Computing
>> (919) 254-2645
>> T/L: 444-2645
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>>
>> > Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/21/2006 02:16 PM
>> > 
>> > Andrew,
>> > Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests run 
>> > during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines
>> since 
>> > they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle this? We 
>> > made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in
>> mind.
>> > 
>> > Dan
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > Andrew Eberbach/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM:
>> > > 
>> > > Hi, 
>> > > 
>> > > I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so
>> in 
>> > > standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get
>> started 
>> > > implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and
>> running I'll 
>> > > update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall
>> usage so that
>> > > others can also contribute things like 
>> > > 
>> > > - junit test cases 
>> > > - platform targets 
>> > > 
>> > > and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the
>> build. We're 
>> > > also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and
>> with that
>> > > I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage
>> analysis posted. 
>> > > 
>> > > Again, any and all input is welcome. 
>> > > 
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Andrew
>> > > 
>> > > Andrew Eberbach
>> > > Autonomic Computing
>> > > (919) 254-2645
>> > > T/L: 444-2645
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Testing-tf2312453.html#a11715707
Sent from the Muse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to