Hi, I think that covers a lot of it.
I would suggest you use Apache machines for doing all of the unix stuff, and use something at IBM to do the windows stuff. Last time I checked only unix machines were available at Apache. Thanks, Andrew ----- Original Message ---- From: Kam K. Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 4:45:13 PM Subject: Re: Testing Hey Andrew/All, Can you share what the thoughts were on the degree of testing that would be taking place? As I understand things today, a comprehensive matrix will probably include combinations of the following: OSes JREs/J2MEs Muse container ==== ========== ============== Windows XP Sun JRE 1.4.2_15 Axis2 1.1 (on Tomcat 5.5.23) RedHat Linux Sun Java 5.0 Update 12 Axis2 1.1 (on Tomcat 6.0.13) (?) Any other OSes (?) Sun Java 6.0 Update 2 miniSOAP (on Tomcat 5.5.23) IBM 1.4.2 SR 9 miniSOAP (on Tomcat 6.0.13) (?) IBM Java 5.0 SR 5 OSGi (version X.Y.Z) with J2SE IBM Java 6.0 OSGi (version X.Y.Z) with J2ME J2ME (version X.Y.Z) How much of this was envisioned taking place on the Apache-provided machines? If having enough machines to cover all the environment combinations presents to be a restriction, which ones would be consider the priorities? Regards, Kam K. Yee IBM Corporation Andrew Eberbach wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I just heard back from the guys at apache and this might be something >> they >> can accomodate. I'm still waiting to hear back with details. I'll keep >> you >> posted. In the meanwhile I'm putting together the framework so that we >> can >> start writing tests for it. >> >> Thanks, >> Andrew >> >> Andrew Eberbach >> Autonomic Computing >> (919) 254-2645 >> T/L: 444-2645 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/21/2006 02:16 PM >> > >> > Andrew, >> > Thanks for getting this started. I assume that some of the tests run >> > during the nightly build will have to happen on non-Apache machines >> since >> > they will not have the IBM JDK(s); how do you intend to handle this? We >> > made need to ask the PMC for advice here, unless you have a plan in >> mind. >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > >> > > Andrew Eberbach/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/21/2006 10:50:57 AM: >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I haven't heard anything back about my proposed testing strategy, so >> in >> > > standard fashion I'll assume silence means no disagreement. I'll get >> started >> > > implementing the test infrastructure and as I get parts up and >> running I'll >> > > update documentation on the site to provide examples and overall >> usage so that >> > > others can also contribute things like >> > > >> > > - junit test cases >> > > - platform targets >> > > >> > > and have them seamlessly integrate (famous last words) into the >> build. We're >> > > also in the process of getting the nightly builds up and running and >> with that >> > > I'll have automatically generated junit reports and code coverage >> analysis posted. >> > > >> > > Again, any and all input is welcome. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Andrew >> > > >> > > Andrew Eberbach >> > > Autonomic Computing >> > > (919) 254-2645 >> > > T/L: 444-2645 >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Testing-tf2312453.html#a11715707 Sent from the Muse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________________________________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
