>Okay, I get what you mean. But that doesn't change the frequency >response of a half-sample delay, or doesn't mean that a half-sample >delay doesn't have a specific gain at Nyquist.
Never said that it did. In fact, I explicitly said that this issue of sampling of Nyquist frequency sinusoids has no bearing on the frequency response of fractional interpolators. I'd suggest dropping this whole derail, if you are no longer hung up on this point. E On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Peter S <peter.schoffhau...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18/08/2015, Ethan Duni <ethan.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > That class of signals is band limited to SR/2. The aliasing is in the > > amplitude/phase offset, not the frequency. > > Okay, I get what you mean. But that doesn't change the frequency > response of a half-sample delay, or doesn't mean that a half-sample > delay doesn't have a specific gain at Nyquist. > _______________________________________________ > music-dsp mailing list > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp >
_______________________________________________ music-dsp mailing list music-dsp@music.columbia.edu https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
