I certainly found it interesting. Thanks for sharing! I find it interesting though that (aside from the limiter threshold in the first example) you are moving from a parametric interface to an empirical one. It seems to me to be used more powerfully in realtime or with automation, in a live situation or a DAW the effect will need some parametric editing capabilities. The idea is certainly a departure from the status quo and offers some great features of simplicity to describe some arbitrary envelopes or delays (I especially like the idea of the delay), but I couldn't help but think of my workflow and whether I could use such things. Perhaps the modern DAW workflow is not the best way to do it, but it did seem like none of the interfaces suggested fit very smoothly into it.
Parametric designs came out of the circuit designs that placed a potentiometer to change the cutoff of this analog filter, or the frequency of an oscillator, but IMO they have held strong because of the tweakability. There is a steeper learning curve for sure, but you typically know exactly how the envelope will change as you move each knob of an ADSR. I love the work and find this topic very interesting so I hope you continue the work and continue to publish what you are finding and experimenting with. If you are shopping around for next step ideas I would consider trying to adapt the interface in a way that allows musical, realtime, on-line, tweaking. Perhaps a second envelope could be sung and then blend between the two, like an envelope-wavetable, or perhaps a few knobs with parameters like stretch and skew. There are lots of possibilities. Or I could just be wrong and you'll show me some totally different way to do it! Just some thoughts... _Spencer On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Arthur Carabott <arth...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been doing some work on re-designing the interactions / interfaces > for music software. The focus isn't on the DSP, more on how we can better > interact with it. That said, there are some engineering implications > (particularly with the first prototype). > > Hope you enjoy! http://arthurcarabott.com/mui/ > > If the work interests you feel free to mail me off list as well. > > Best, > > Arthur > > www.arthurcarabott.com > > _______________________________________________ > dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp >
_______________________________________________ dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list music-dsp@music.columbia.edu https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
