On Sunday, January 08, 2006 5:28 PM, Schika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The EU is clearly defined and also has an ISO code, like other >> countries, even though it's not technically a country (although it >> exhibits several properties of a country). I will gladly submit a >> patch to include the EU, but I can't see us coming to an agreement >> about which continents even exist. Because we seem to like infinite questioning. > After a discussion with that label about "EU" and "Europe" they made > me clear: They who? A single label? Amrican one? > * They publish the records for the Europian continent only. European. What does it mean? there is not European continent in fact? > * If they would publish for the Europian Union, European. > they have to ship the recordings all over the world (nearly all colonies of > France, > Netherlands, Denmark, Portugal, Spain and Great Britain counts to the > EU). No, they do their [...] release following EU standards and law and then they could keep it at their home:, you are not really obliged to send an EU realease in all Eu if they don't want it. > The term 'made in the EU' is only formal to assign EU rights > for the products. > * Real "EU" releases don't exist at all. Thanks for warning me, from tomorrow I will infringe all the EU laws that rules my life as an italian. --- We are really really all becoming ridiculus. I say this once more but for the very last time, MB has two choice: 1) add EU as release contry, since it's a country, 2) let moderator add EU releases as Anctartica, which is not a country. This is a quite easy issue. The ability of MB to solve it says it all. Ciao MArco / ClutchEr2 _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
