On 4/7/06, mud crow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not all parodys are covers > <snip> > > I think that either the word cover should not be used in context with parody > or that two parody ARs should be added. Also parody needs to be track-artist > and track-track in relationships. > > [track] is a parody cover of [track] > [track] is a parody on the style of [artist] or should that be "of the > style" ?
exactly. this is what i had suggested earlier, either as "style parody" or as "pastiche". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastiche -- --dj empirical-- --------- http://www.myspace.com/djempirical hey, look what i wrote: http://i-see-sound.com/?q=author/15 _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
