Not practical, to say the least ;-) And anyhow, annotations are not in the database way of thinking. For example, if I wanted to retrieve a list of the albums where Babe's music was used, the annotation would allow me to get it. But if I wanted a list of all the tracks from Babe (for example if a soundtrack album was never released, this happened to me recently), the annotation would not really make the trick. I don't think MB currently offers us any reasonably easy way to do it, so the annotation is still better than nothing.
2006/4/11, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is a large album annotation so daunting? I've seen a few. I offered to do > it. So far I haven't seen even the comment annotation noted. Yet less a > request that I do it. I am more than happy to do it. > > Beth aka Nyght > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederic > Da Vitoria > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 3:07 AM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mb-style] Contextual information in track title > > 2006/4/10, Jan van Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 4/10/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Um, sorry if I disagree with everyone here, but IMO this is > > > ExtraTitleInformation which does not belong into the TrackTitle and > should > > > be left to the AlbumAnnotation (except if it were used to differentiate > > > between two tracks of the same title on the same album). > > > > > > DonRedman > > > > Yes, I agree with Don. > > > > -- > > Jan van Thiel > > Don and Jan, > > You realize this would mean a very big annotation, since each track > was from a different source? > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria -- Frederic Da Vitoria _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
