Chris Bransden wrote:
On 28/04/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
derGraph wrote:
> I would still favour
> "artist {additionally} {co-}{executive }produced album or track",
> but I'm not sure whether the space after "executive" is valid, or if it
> can be replaced with "{executive:executive }".
Yes, with "{executive:executive }" it is possible. Additional
co-executive producer, hehe. Whoever finds that in some liner notes
will receive 5 bars of finest chocolate from me!
I think now we outlined nearly every possible solution. Could everyone
please tell what they prefer? I want to see this closed...
i prefer "artist {additionally} {co-}{executive:executive }produced
album or track" but like i said, i'm not particularly bothered about
their being a potential impossible combination ("additional
co-executive producer"), and i think it's better to have that 'risk'
and keep all attribs in the same place.
Ok, I can agree here. We can always regulate combinations by style guidelines
on the relationship type page.
Request for veto!
Simon (Shepard)
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
