Um, I just finished logging my suggestions and objections into the wiki doc. Is that not what we were just invited to do? Lemme know and I will clean it out.
On Tue, October 3, 2006 4:32 pm, Frederic Da Vitoria said: > > I'd rather disagree with point 2 for two reasons: > a - the limits will always be difficult to define and we risk edit wars > b - precisely, it changes the database semantics, worse it makes the > semantics vary depending on something that is, to say the least, not > obvious > (from a dumb computer's point of view): the release title. = > Outside of Frederic's technical vantage point, point 2 just doesn't seem desirable to me. I'll just remind all that I posted a very polite and constructive list of releases that point 2 would seem to apply to under the "RFC[?]" subject, and await comments. (OK, so it wasn't polite to say that James Levine has a big head. He does, though.) -DS _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
