On 1/23/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/1/23, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 04:23:44PM +0100, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> > Shouldn't we recommend to put the actual name of the release in the
> > Annotation?
>
> Erm... assuming the release actually has a discernable name, other
> than the titles of the included works. I would have assumed that the
> relatively few classical titles with a clear release name would have
> that as the release name, and this convention would be used only for
> the many that don't.
I don't like exceptions (as I said, I believe we should keep the rules
as simple as possible). But for some releases (especially classical
compilations), it could be more practical than using a list of the
works as release title!
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
This discussion doesn't apply to classical compilations that feature
"random" parts from different works. The releases I meant are the
classical albums that usually feature a couple complete works
(possibly spread over multiple discs).
(Just clarifying)
--
-Aaron
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
