On 06/03/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:28:03PM +0100, Erik Dalén wrote:
> Jan van Thiel wrote:
> > I agree that these have to be cleaned up. But I don't think a
> > guideline is necessary. Common sense should do the trick ;) And for me
> > that is: if the ReleaseArtist is clearly stated on the release (which
> > is for most/all of these releases), it should be set. Of course, also
> > a DJ-Mixed by/Compiled by AR should be created.
I agree :)
> So in your opinion this release should be Ladytron not Various Artists?
>
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/b6cbb7a5-a0c2-47f8-93a2-7157874249eb.html
Yes. (imo).
-- kuno (warp).
thirded :) this release is part of the ladytron canon, regardless of
it having VA content. it needs to appear on their artist page (other
than just an AR), IMO.
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
