Kuno Woudt-2 wrote: > > So, I propose to split [ConsistentOriginalData] into two new pages, and > throw away > the current name to avoid any further confusion. >
Support. Kuno Woudt-2 wrote: > > The two new pages would be: > > > ConsistentOfficialData > > "If, something is consistently labelled in a different style on official > sources, then this classifies as ConsistentOfficialData and overrules the > StyleGuidelines. Note that you need to provide some evidence for > ConsistentOriginalData (ideally in the EditNote), or your edits will most > likely be voted down." > As Lauri pointed out, you use "Original" one time in this paragraph, where you should use "Official". I also like the Gecks suggestion in http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ConsistentOriginalData . I made a couple of minor suggestions there. ----- -- http://jdlh.com/ Jim DeLaHunt , Vancouver, Canada • http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/JimDeLaHunt -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-Splitting-up-ConsistentOriginalData-tp15677693s2885p15706827.html Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
