> Maybe that isn't that important, I can't think of any decent example > where it mattered, but you're right, band lineups are often fluid > between albums anyway.
Heh. You posted perfectly good examples right there, but it only reinforces the point that it's not really necessary. What matters (IMHO) is: Did they change their name themselves. For whatever purpose, did the band, itself, while still together, decide they needed a new name, and do they have music released under both (all) names. What we don't want (again, IMHO) is: Using such an AR to deal with the fact that post-career compilations tend to invent bazillions of name combinations that never actually existed. Those should still be merged out of existence, this AR should only be for _real_ band name changes. Hopefully that's clearer than my first attempt. -- Lauri Watts. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
