No strong opinions here :) Paul C. Bryan wrote: > I interpret the word eponymous to mean anything named after a particular > person (not just an artist lending their name to something), which would > therefore currently include these examples of quartets named after > deceased composers. > > I don't mind these quartets being sorted by their namesakes, but others > (you?) may have a strong opinion one way or the other. If this seems too > broad, then I suppose we may need to further constrain it. > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 20:15 +0100, Leiv Hellebo wrote: >> Paul C. Bryan wrote: >>> Proposal: >>> Change the last bullet of #6 in SortNameStyle to read as follows: >>> Artist names that contain a person's name (usually eponymous band names) >>> sort as the person primarily, with remaining identifiers as >>> comma-separated suffixes. Examples: "The Sensational Alex Harvey Band" >>> has sort name "Harvey, Alex, Sensational, Band, The". "The Jimi Hendrix >>> Experience" has sort name "Hendrix, Jimi, Experience, The". >> Not that I mind (much), but I'd like to have clarified if you want: >> >> Berg, Alban, Quartet >> Haas, Pavel, Quartet >> >> These two quartets were formed long after the composers were dead. >> >> (I am not sure how "usually eponymous band names" should be understood, >> but perhaps it means exactly that you'd like "Berg, Alban, Quartet"?) >> >> Leiv >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
