hi i think that's sound and probably applies to reviews links too. how do people feel about the reviews relationship going to release level too?
-----Original Message----- From: musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org [mailto:musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org] On Behalf Of Calvin Walton Sent: 01 June 2011 18:15 To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion Subject: Re: [mb-style] RFV: Extend Official Homepage Relationship Type toReleases On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:11 +0100, Pete Marsh wrote: > hi > > Why not add this at release group level? I notice that's where the URL > relationships (eg link to a review) seem to sit now...or do we think > all those relationships should be at release level? The reasoning for this was that for the examples I could find, the website or discography entry link referenced a particular release (or small set of similar releases) - and may not be relevant for later re-releases. If you can find an example that you think would be a better fit at the release group level, I would have no objection to adding a relationship there, as well. -- Calvin Walton <calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca> _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
