On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2011/6/8, Michael Wiencek <mwt...@gmail.com>: >> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance >> of" >> relationship. It should expire on June 15. >> >> There is a current revision at: >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_Relationship_Type_Live_Attribute >> >> As you can see, the attribute "indicates that the recording is of a live >> performance," and has the following short guideline: >> >> "Use the live attribute when the performance had an audience at the time it >> occurred, i.e. it was not prerecorded." >> >> The link phrases should ideally be ordered... >> <recording> is a {live} {cover} performance of <work> >> <work> has {live} {cover} performance <recording> >> And the shorter versions: >> {live} {cover} performance of: <work> >> {live} {cover} performances: <recordings> >> >> What I also wanted to do was use the date attributes to store the date of >> the >> performance, but perhaps this should be discussed further. If there is wide >> agreement to that, I can update the RFC or send a new one. > > +1 on the live attribute. I am not sure the date needs discussion > since the recording date would necessarily be the performance date.
That's my understanding as well. The only change I'd seek in regards to that is replacing the "there is no guideline yet for how the date fields might be used" (how it always was) with an actual guideline. Michael > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
