Calvin Walton-2 wrote: > > Now with infinitely more wiki page templates, and its very own RFC > number! > > This proposal is to add or change two ARs: > > * Official Homepage > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Kepstin/Official_Homepage_Relationship_Type_Proposal > > A new Release Group → URL relation will be added to the Official > Homepage relationship type, to allow linking releases groups to > an official website published by the artist or label. > > * Discography Entry > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Kepstin/Discography_Entry_Relationship_Type > > A new Release → URL relationship type, to allow linking > individual versions of releases to sub-pages of discography > sites. > > I'm still not entirely sure what to do with the wording on the Official > Homepage relation: should I use a different wording for release groups > than the other types? Or should I change them all to be consistent? > > Discuss! > > -- > Calvin Walton <calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca> > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > Perhaps "has an official homepage at" (and vice versa) should be used instead, as:
Firstly, IMO "website" isn't consistent terminology with "homepage"; it should be "webpage". Though, then my concern is that "official webpage" may be confused with any release listing on an artist's website. Thus, "official homepage" is probably more apt than "official website". Is that too pedantic? :P -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-324-v2-Official-Website-and-Discography-Entry-ARs-for-Releases-Release-Groups-tp3585730p3588549.html Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
