Lemire, Sebastien wrote: > There might not be numbers, but they were definitely composed with an > order in mind. > I absolutely don't want MB to add 1. 2. 3. in front of movements, but > somehow it would be best for the order to preserved
I liked what Christopher Key proposed: Having a sort name field on works that will be used for ordering relationships. I meant to say that before but for some reason I sent my reply only to him and not the list. :-) Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
