I would suggest using tags to mark them temporarily if there's really that
much voter resistance.  (It doesn't matter how long your tag is, it could be
a sentence...)

2011/6/29 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com>

> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:21 AM, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2011/6/29 Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net>
> >>
> >> Though RFC-322 (Partial performances) seems to have been
> >> uncontroversial, it seems that there are still objections being raised
> >> in actual edits[1] on the grounds that some works (those which have
> >> parts) cannot have partial performances.
> >>
> >
> > Just a very short answer for know: a super-work / agregate work is not =
> a
> > work.
>
> A release is also not a recording, but when we don't know to what
> recording something applies we add it to the release. I see a
> parallelism here, so I wouldn't object using the super-work for these
> issues.
> > /symphonick
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to