2011/6/30 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:21 AM, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Just a very short answer for know: a super-work / agregate work is not = > a > > work. > > A release is also not a recording, but when we don't know to what > recording something applies we add it to the release. I see a > parallelism here, so I wouldn't object using the super-work for these > issues. >
Sorry, I don't understand? I see a parallelism with the old performer AR discussion, where some editors wanted "fuzzy" performer ARs @ release level (= "goes here somewhere") while other editors wanted accurate ARs @ track level. Here, some editors want to use the super work - recording performance AR to mean "it's in here somewhere", while I would prefer a more exact "it's a performance of all parts of this super work" /symphonick
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
