Am 30.06.2011, 10:45 Uhr, schrieb symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com>: >> Why? What is false about the statement "This is a partial performance >> of this superwork", which also allows it to inherit the composer info? >> Complete info > Incomplete but correct info > no info > bad info. >> I'd say this is a case of 2. >> >> It's not false, it's inaccurate (& see the edit notes about whether > recordings should be allowed for this work at all) & as I said, I rather > have high-quality data.
it may not be most precise, but it is still a gain in data quality (and correct!) linking this partially. i can't follow your arguments.. in consequence we should delete the whole release because we can't enter it in a degree of accuracy that satisfies us? i am also pro high-quality data, but if i can't enter something in the best way, i decide for the second best. and removing (indirectly) all the ARs that are/may be attached to the work is definitely not leading to a better data quality. -- lorenz pressler PGP 0x92E9551A _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
