On 01/16/2012 03:49 PM, Brant Gibbard wrote: > > [snipped] > > Is the intention here that the information should be entered in the > disambiguation field INSTEAD of in the title, or in addition to it?
Instead. If there is a situation where the disambiguation comments need to show up and they don’t, that’s a bug or enhancement for the MB server which should be fixed, not a reason to put disambiguation info in the title. —Alex Mauer “hawke” > > If the former then I would be opposed unless you could also change the > display upon doing a search for a release group to display the > disambiguation information as well as the name of the release group and > artist. If I do a search on, e.g. Baroque Favourites as a release group, > there are four items with that title, and I see from experimenting that the > disambiguation information does not display. Currently three of those four > have artist information in the title which enables me to determine from my > search results which specific release it is I am looking for. If we take the > artist information out of this sort of generic title display I will have to > waste time individually clicking on each group in turn to get to a page > where I can see the disambiguation, then backing up to check the next one > and so on. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style