On 01/16/2012 03:49 PM, Brant Gibbard wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> Is the intention here that the information should be entered in the
> disambiguation field INSTEAD of in the title, or in addition to it?

Instead. If there is a situation where the disambiguation comments need 
to show up and they don’t, that’s a bug or enhancement for the MB server 
which should be fixed, not a reason to put disambiguation info in the title.

—Alex Mauer “hawke”

>
> If the former then I would be opposed unless you could also change the
> display upon doing a search for a release group to display the
> disambiguation information as well as the name of the release group and
> artist. If I do a search on, e.g. Baroque Favourites as a release group,
> there are four items with that title, and I see from experimenting that the
> disambiguation information does not display. Currently three of those four
> have artist information in the title which enables me to determine from my
> search results which specific release it is I am looking for. If we take the
> artist information out of this sort of generic title display I will have to
> waste time individually clicking on each group in turn to get to a page
> where I can see the disambiguation, then backing up to check the next one
> and so on.



_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to