On 1/12/2012 3:05 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> This is RFC-347, expiring 2012-01-19.
>
> It updates the CSG for the NGS schema, without trying to do anything too
> ambitious (cf. CSGv2).
Further discussion has brought forth the point that the Works definition
in CSG-mod was rather tautological (describing Work title as the title
of the Work plus the title of the work part)
Also, the second section ("additional guidelines") only covered
arbitrary elements of work titles anyway, and didn't really add anything.
I changed the headings to reflect this, and updated the works definition
to point to CSGv2 which is much more comprehensive, if unofficial.
So, is there something more relevant/correct/useful but perhaps simpler
that could describe how to build a work title? Or is CSGv2 the right
place to put this?
Should I leave the second section as an "introduction to classical
works", just enough to allow someone to build a classical work title?
Or should I remove it entirely?
Thanks
--Alex Mauer "hawke"
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
