2012/1/28 symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com>

> I recall no one had any ideas of what to do with track artists. I'm going
> to suggest that we leave them at the default value (=release artist).
>
> Slightly reworded from the 2011 wiki:
> Artist Credits
>
> Recording Artist Credits should link to the performer, not the composer.
> Composer information should be included in a linked work (by way of the
> recording-work performance AR).
>
> *Disambiguation*
>
> If this would result in confusingly similar recording title/artist
> combinations on more than one recording done of works by different
> composers, the composer(s) may be added to the comment field. This way, the
> composer will appear in contextual search (such as the "Relate to..."
> dialog).
> *the old UI-workaround (add performers to the title of the release and
> releasegroup) does not apply anymore.
>

Doesn't this mean that the MP3 Artist tag for all kinds of tracks (even
classical) will be the performer, not the composer? As long as we don't
have a MB database aware player, this would be quite annoying to me.

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to