On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <phi...@foolip.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> <reosare...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM, jesus2099 <hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org>
>> wrote:
>>> Here is my re-phrase as now RFV-333 can be bypassed (according to Réo) :
>>>
>>> I speak of this RFV-346 compromise. :)
>>> Which is a compromise between my "always space" and your "never space".
>>>
>>> The problem with your more recent version is that it’s less of a compromise
>>> as it systematically chooses the "never space" on a big amount of entities
>>> ("never space on recordings, release-groups and works"), letting the "as is"
>>> style on tracklists only.
>>>
>>> This is why I prefer the compromise version (RFV-346).
>>> Or, to the limit, your new version with the following change could be
>>> reasonably acceptable too :
>>> from
>>> « "Never space" on recordings, release-groups and works. »
>>> to
>>> « "Never space" on recordings, release-groups and works IF AND ONLY WHEN
>>> THERE IS INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN SEVERAL RELEASES/EDITIONS/VERSIONS/ETC. »
>>
>> This sounds reasonable to me, and easy to apply too (follow cover
>> unless covers disagree).
>
> I could live with that as well.
\o/ Does this mean we have an agreement? \o/
> --
> Philip Jägenstedt
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
