Hallo Andii Hughes: > On 28 May 2012 21:33, Per Starbäck <per.starb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Says you. Whereas destroying the usability of MBz because of that > > principle is simply not acceptable to me. The current entry for that > > release group is simply a lot less useful. If your principle was > > carried out generally for all releases it would be unwieldy for such a > > large part of my cds that I wouldn't use MBz anymore for ripping cds > > (and therefore probably not use it at all). It would simply not be > > useful. > > That principle is already applied to other release groups. It's how the > schema > of MB currently is, like it or not.
I'm also under the impression that that's how NGS is/was supposed to work - the release/medium examples on [0] all include *at least* the release date and country to identify a specific release. [1] also states that > Information that was previously stored in a release event will now be > stored at the release-level, effectively making each pre-NGS release > event a separate NGS release, complete with its own MBID. and the pre-NGS release events *did* include date and country fields. [0] http://musicbrainz.org/doc/MusicBrainz_Database/Schema [1] http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Server_Release_Notes/NGS_Beta_1#Release -- Wieland _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
