On 09/06/12 01:17, Ryan Torchia wrote: > Honestly, I think absolutely mimicking the release is unnecessary here. > The point of doing this seems to be simply to communicate side breaks > where they exist, which we don't do now. Standardizing that to A/B/C/D > is sufficient, and is consistent with how other sites label this > information. I can see an argument for using A/AA when the artist uses > it, though I'd prefer noting such detail in annotations and sticking > with standard formatting. I can't see the use of numbers instead of > letters in side designations some sort of intentional artistic > statement. Just my opinion though, and I'm not going to fault anybody > who disagrees. > --Torc.
I don't we should try to use the free-form track numbers to indicate side breaks. MusicBrainz should get proper support for representing medium sides, we shouldn't try to force this information into other fields which weren't intended for it. -- kuno / warp. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
