Hello, On 06/12/2012 11:40 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Kuno Woudt<k...@frob.nl> wrote: >> Again, we just need proper support for medium sides in musicbrainz. And >> I would much prefer it if someone champions that and figures out what >> kind of schema changes we need to make for that to happen than to spend >> time discussing how to try to cram it into these free-form track numbers. > > > So, while we have a way that works right now, for better or worse, and > that should be quite simple to turn into those sides if they're ever > added, you propose waiting until the huge pile of tickets to work on > gives the devs time to work on this? Can you please explain *any* > advantage of that approach that doesn't involve sitting in an ivory > tower?
We don't have a concrete proposal for side support yet, so currently it is not the lack of development time blocking this. Someone needs to figure out exactly what we want from this, take it all the way from the current vague "we need this" into actionable tickets for developers to work on. -- kuno / warp. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
