On 12/11/2012 01:03, Sheamus Patt wrote: > So, I'd be happy to support this proposal, but only once we have better > ways in MB to deal with cases like this and many others where we still > need to associate those different "unique audio" segments to a common > session, with common performers, venue etc., and do so in a way that > doesn't take up even more of our time editing MB data.
I agree with Sheamus's arguments and his conclusion. Every time, say, Naxos takes a recording and puts it on yet another release, it is presumably going to be normalised / equalised or processed in some way. Editors should only have to enter the ARs for the original recording session once. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
