On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:15 PM, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/2/27 ListMyCDs.com <musicbra...@listmycds.com> > > On 27.2.2013 13:09, symphonick wrote: >> >> > I disagree. Every arrangement that exists is not a valuable work, you >> > can always credit the arranger with the arranger AR. >> >> Not everything is valuable but because of the rules we would be limiting >> also valuable information. I can't add lyricist and translator names to >> recordings. I can't link imslp scores and wikipedia urls to recordings. >> > > If you feel that an AR is missing, why not make a RFC for a new AR? > I doubt anyone feels lyricists or translators belong on recordings. They belong on works, the problem comes if there's only one recording of the translation - should we then not add a work? (we probably should anyway, right?). And if so, why not for an arrangement? Just because there happens to be a recording-level relationship? > "version for orchestra" could be a recording of "version for piano". It >> makes no sense. >> > I assume he means it makes no sense to link an orchestration as a recording of the original piano version just because there's only one recording of that orchestration. Of course, when we start being able to store instrumentation info on works (which I fully expect will happen) this will make even less sense. -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
