Yes, we do

2013/3/9 SwissChris <swissch...@gmail.com>

> All I say is: some informations are too complex, too subjective, too
> controversial to fit into a structured DB field.
> So we agree: "probably too difficult to implement and also outside of
> what MB should do."  ;-)
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria 
> <davito...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 2013/3/8 SwissChris <swissch...@gmail.com>
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ah, but I wasn't speaking of "political" borders. I was saying that
>>>> historical borders had a major cultural signification, and that current
>>>> political borders (which IIUC is the only thing you want to consider) are
>>>> mostly irrelevant for example for Vivaldi or Bach or Mozart. There aren't
>>>> so many historical Artists in MB. Letting the users who know about them
>>>> discuss what areas would be relevant to those Artists would not be a major
>>>> issue IMO.
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course historical borders are of cultural relevance. But what do we
>>> gain from having as birth country of the *german* composer Bach the
>>> "duchy of Saxe-Eisenach" (or IMO the "Herzogtum Sachsen-Eisenach"), or from
>>> replacing *Italy *with "Republicca di Venezia" as birth place of the *
>>> italian* composer Vivaldi?
>>>
>>> For every major composer of the past we now have a direct wiki link
>>> showing, within the first few lines, all these details, which are IMO too
>>> complex to fit in a DB-structure like ours ;-)
>>>
>>> Had we Immanuel Kant in the DB, the wiki would spell: "*Immanuel Kant* (
>>> German: [ɪˈmaːnu̯eːl 
>>> kant]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_German>;
>>> 22 April 1724 – 12 February 1804) was a 
>>> German<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germans> philosopher
>>> from Königsberg <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6nigsberg> in
>>> Prussia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Prussia> (today
>>> Kaliningrad <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaliningrad>, 
>>> Russia<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia>)
>>> who …" Why should we (and our devs, who have more important things to do)
>>> invest time and sweat in duplicating within MB these easily available
>>> informations?
>>>
>>
>> Why enter birth countries at all since they are (more correctly) stored
>> in WP? If I follow your reasoning, then I suggest we entirely remove those
>> data. At least this would be consistent. While we are at it, I suggest we
>> also remove a lot of Releases which are entered with much more detail in WP
>> than in MB :-D Seriously, data duplication between different information
>> systems is not an argument IMO. If it is relevant to MB and it can
>> technically be stored into our database, then we should do it. WP is a
>> wiki, not a database and as such does not allow queries in the way that MB
>> does.
>>
>> But using historical "Areas" may not be useful because I think I'd be
>> more interested in who lived in Flanders than in who lived in Ghent, more
>> in a cultural region than into a maybe obscure little town. This way of
>> using the data (where the database would be able to "enlarge" a city to
>> it's cultural region) is probably too difficult to implement and also
>> outside of what MB should do.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Frederic Da Vitoria
>> (davitof)
>>
>> Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
>> http://www.april.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
>> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>



-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to