I was thinking of something simple, like those from your second group of suggestions. I only wanted to avoid users mixing both track concepts. Any of those two sentences with a link to the Track definition would be perfect IMO.
2013/4/19 Tom Crocker <tomcrockerm...@gmail.com> > On 19 April 2013 09:43, Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That's the last point which should be clarified here IMO: The "audio >> track" definition should state that "audio track" are not to be confused >> with Tracks in Releases. >> > > It's some slippery wording that's needed if it's to be done. These are not > examples, just the relationships as I see them: > A release-track may (or may not) be an audio-track in a mix or edit > A release-track is not an audio-track when unmixed and unedited because it > has been mastered for release (I think we can include conversion to release > format as mastering here) > A release-track is linked to a recording, which is a set of one or more > audio-tracks > > That's going to be very hard to say clearly and concisely, unless all we > say is: > Audio tracks are a related but different concept to release tracks -or- > Audio tracks should not be confused with release tracks > Any other suggestions, or just leave it to be potentially a bit confusing > but not drastically? > > >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
