What about an edit made from a mastered track? Would that not be interpreted as 'mastered', therefore excluded? As I mentioned in my last post, I think stating the sources are important, rather than defining 'recording' negatively. Also, not mastered could be construed as meaning that anything that has been mastered is not a recording.
Perhaps: "...any stored representation of sound that exists prior to the mastering stage" -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-208-New-Recordings-Guidelines-tp4651054p4652490.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
