I agree it won't be regularly used. However, I don't think the bits I added complicated the definition, because the definition itself stands alone and is the only definition in there. The rest of it is explanation to help ensure people understand it in the way we intend, not just now but in the future. Actually, that's why I was finally happy to add microphone in there. I thought it was a (very) bad idea to put it in any definition, because it is so specific, but to use it to help explain what the definition of recording means seems like a good idea to me. IMO, what I added is an expanded version of the sentence you had there before, taken at a slower pace and with a bit more detail.
On 9 May 2013 18:55, Ben Ockmore <ben.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't really want to include mixing/editing/recording audio if it's not > absolutely necessary, cause the whole point was to get rid of the > complexity they introduce. > > I really think people won't have any trouble using this, given that the > style guideline explains everything, and there's that sentence describing > how recordings relate to other entities. > > Before this proposal, I could probably count on one hand the number of > times I'd used the recordings definition page. > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
