I wasn't aware that was going to happen, but I'm not sure what effect it will have on the ability of people to understand the recording definition. I would think as long as there are enough "usually" "such as" "for example" and "typically"s in there it wouldn't matter if editors misinterpreted mix or edit because they don't do the defining. I also think that the sentence about copying and mastering helps make the meaning of the definition very clear. But I would :) On May 9, 2013 9:19 PM, "Ben Ockmore" <ben.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But a lot of that stuff can go in > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Mix_Terminology, when that gets updated (and > renamed). If we mention mixing and editing in the recording definition > page, there's the danger that editors will misinterpret those words without > the extra definitions we had before. > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
