On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:14 AM, monxton <musicbra...@jordan-maynard.org>wrote:
> On 02/01/2014 17:14, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen wrote: > > Den 02-01-2014 12:30, Frederic Da Vitoria skrev: > >> I may be wrong, but I don't think a > >> user will one day need an easy way to select together the cathedrals and > >> the Buddhist temples. > > > > If you can think of it, chances are someone will want to be able to do > > just that some time in the future. We should not hinder this. > > > > However, interlinking with other sources (Wikidata, OSM, etc.) so that > > it is possible to cross-reference against those will likely be the way > > to achieve such a goal, making a further division unneeded. > > I agree, I can't see a point in us subdividing these venue types, when > other databases probably do it better. So we should tell users to go write Wikipedia pages or whatever if they want to say "this is a church"? Well, fine, never going to happen but we'll live. What is the point of a venue type that means everything though? For that, we might as well remove it and stick to Studio and Other.
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
