I know this is closed, but I may as well write it here. I don't see any problem with a list of venue types as places. What is a problem is the definitions in https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Place.
The dichotomy between Studio and Venue does not make sense. The venue has no relevance to whether the performance is Live or Studio (i.e. non-live). Whether the performance was for an audience or not is relevant to release and recording secondary types. So really we should have a list of different venue types, then Live and Studio as release and recording secondary types. Also, I think it's pretty clear that any building referred to as a church etc clearly is what is claims to be, regardless of whether it is actively used in connection with religious practice. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-279-Add-Place-of-Worship-as-place-type-tp4660918p4661664.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
