On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:45 PM, symphonick <symphon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't expect an RFV for this, I thought it was a WIP. > > While I hope these 2 categories should be mostly harmless, a couple of > things bothers me: > The ticket and the RFV message says different things (also one could > perhaps argue that this is not the version of the proposal you had recieved > +1:s for), > "As a minimum, I'd like the top level here" says the ticket and said the RFC. I assumed it was obvious enough that if there was disagreement on lower levels I'd go forward with just the top. > but I'm mostly concerned with the lack of documentation. > I did forget to create a version of Artist/Type indeed, although I don't really think there's much to document at this level. I have added http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Artist/Type now, which specifies that not all instrumental/vocal ensembles are orchestras/choirs in case that was needed.
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
