On 22.3.2014 10:51, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen wrote: > If we know the earliest publication, we can add a published relationship > with "[unknown]" for that date. If you want to know *on* the > relationship whether it was the first, a relationship attribute might be > in order. This would also solve the inevitable case where we know *who* > published it first, but we don't know when.
With attributes this information would be easily available but also easy to to add when adding new works. With relationships editors won't even notice the option to store it. You would need to know that publisher is actually stored in label entity and that there's special [unknown] label where you need to link it. Like I mentioned, most popular classical publisher is now having 5 relationships linked to it. We could add an attribute and maybe someone would add attribute to 2 of these. I closed the ticket and this RFC isn't active anymore. It's easier for me to continue storing this information to my own database. -- ListMyCDs / Timo Martikainen _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
