The artist-artist should be doable. The question is how much accuracy you want; second/alternating, freelance and so on. Promotions - maybe Foo was hired as a tutti player first. In many cases it will be hard to find this data. Also when is it OK to use this, and when should you not (most groups have a leader)?
Artist - recording is the easiest, I suppose: data is available and unambigous. Artist - release sounds weird to me, is it just somewhere to put the info if you're lazy? 2014-10-21 9:00 GMT+02:00 Frederic Da Vitoria <davito...@gmail.com>: > 2014-10-20 21:52 GMT+02:00 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com > >: > >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Rachel Dwight < >> hibiscuskazen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren < >>> reosare...@musicbrainz.org> wrote: >>> >>> A lot of orchestral releases give information on the orchestra's >>> leader/concertmaster for that recording. Similarly, orchestra sites fairly >>> often provide information about the concertmaster position. As WP says, >>> "The concertmaster [...] is the second-most significant person in an >>> orchestra" - so we probably should allow to record this information. For >>> that I'd like to add artist-recording and artist-release "concertmaster" >>> relationships, similarly to the conductor ones, plus a "concertmaster" >>> attribute to the artist-artist "member of" relationship, to relate the >>> people to the orchestras (since concertmasters are usually first violin or >>> whatever, but in any case a member of the orchestra). >>> >>> Does anyone feel any of the two changes would be problematic, and if so, >>> why and what would be a better way of storing this info? >>> >>> >>> I don’t really see any problems with it. >>> (Is it too soon to +1?) >>> >> >> Well, with the new style process there's no real schedule or need for >> +1ing as such, although knowing that people think the change is ok is never >> a bad thing so I can eventually take a decision :) >> > > OK, since you asked for it: > > I don't see any reason for not doing this either. > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- /symphonick
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
