On 2009/01/20 22:51, Linel Patrice <patnathan...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is an intermediate commit to do a push on another server.
Don't submit intermediate commits. Having intermediate commits in the official repository may break bisections. A patch should be complete and self-contained, i.e. it improves MPD, and doesn't introduce a regression. If you fix bugs in a patch which isn't merged yet, fold the fixes into the existing patch. >> The patch "Begin implementation for pulse mixer" (d8efc9e0) looks >> pointless, because it only adds some commented code. > Yes, but it is an old one , you want me to remove it ? Yes. I see no reason to merge this commit, it doesn't improve MPD. > What does not work, is when i launch mpd without --no-daemon it fails to > get the volume on the mixer. So I don't understand why. Will you be able to find out? Or do you need help? > Do you want me to rewrite all my commit before doing the rebase? I don't know if it makes sense to split the pulse mixer into separate patches. So the easiest way to get your code merged would be to copy your pulse_mixer.c into a new clone of the master repository, and only apply the Makefile.am changes. This way, you don't have to go through all the rebasing/merging pain again. I will never get tired of telling people to use stgit! stgit allows you to refine your patches until they are complete, without creating tons of useless non-self-cointained intermediate patches. Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team