>> "Upsampling works, but only multiples of the native source - ie 44.1
>> to 96 the computer is not powerful enough. however 44.1 to 88.2 or
>> 176.4 works also. Don't even try Secret Rabbit Code upsampling in
>> Foobar, would stall right from the first second with the processor at
>> 100%!!"
>>
>> http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/24192-USB-20-beer-budget-EMU-0404-mini-review?page=1
>>
>> This was written about Windows of course, but it describes my same
>> problem.  44.1->96 is too much for the CPU.  Are you sure this isn't
>> normal?
>
> That *might* be true for MPD, too, but we don't know currently.  My
> point was: even if libsamplerate eats all your CPU, then switching
> between OSS and ALSA shouldn't make any difference.  I'm curious
> what's the real cause of this.

OK, I'll try to get that report together.

> Why are you resampling to 96 kHz anyway?

My DAC sounds much better with libsamplerate upsampling than sending
16/44.1 to it.  Upsampling to 88.1 is a lot easier on the CPU, but it
doesn't sound quite as good.

- Grant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises 
looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest 
innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and 
enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. 
Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get
_______________________________________________
Musicpd-dev-team mailing list
Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team

Reply via email to